or "Don't Buy Your Next Car from a Namibian Rental Company"
or "Why I Love the Giraffe"
or "The Plains are Alive, with the Sound of Ethan"
or "The 5th Epistle from Chilly to the Heathens"
Here I am again, reporting from oh-so-sunny Gauteng (pronounced HOW-teng)
Province -- where both South Africa's executive capital of Pretoria and its
best-known city of Johannesburg are located -- in the midst of what they
call winter. I could get used to some of these winters... Gauteng's winters
are just about as mild as California's (my current home state, so I'm used
to wearing a light jacket) and is likewise known as the land of Gold. [It's
the SUMMERS in San Francisco that kill ya, folks.] Now before I report on
my recent three weeks in Namibia, let me remind y'all once again that I do
indeed LOVE all the emails you've been sending to me. However, as I'm only
able to get online a couple times a week, please make sure that you don't
include the text of my original message to you when you respond to me.
Thanks to 95% of you for following those directions to date. [Also, if you
want to be taken off the email list, just let me know. I recognize these
reports have been getting longer and longer - and that I've added a few of
you onto the email list without actually asking your permission!] As a
final reminder, if you missed any of the previous four 'tomes' from my prior
three months of travel around southern Africa -- and you have a few days set
aside to read them -- just check http://apgar.net/chillye/ to find them all
(thanks as always, Eric).
After arriving in the Namibian capital of Windhoek, I spent a week there
getting a sense of the place and some of the key issues people have been
facing. It was only recently that I realized why it had taken me almost
three weeks there to get a real handle on what was going on. Unlike South
Africa and Zimbabwe, the two countries in which I had spent a good amount of
time previously, I had not really done any background research on Namibia
prior to my arrival. Before landing in South Africa, like many of my
colleagues in the group experiences I joined there in April through June,
I'd read a few books, watched a couple films, and so forth. I'd been
briefed on Zimbabwe prior to my mid-June arrival simply because it had
dominated the news for much of the springtime in this region of the world,
due to both the land invasions and the parliamentary elections.
[By the way, to those of you who've inquired what is going on in Zim
post-elections, a quick summary: the government is having a very difficult
time right now. The predominately white Commercial Farmers Union, which
represents most of the large landowners, just last week threatened to close
down the majority of farms in the country. The concept of a nationwide
strike is being supported by the major labor unions as well - so you can see
that the revolt is being made by a coalition from both the 'right' and the
'left,' a deadly combination. Such an action would shut down most of
whatever small income the nation is generating at this financially depressed
time. That farmers are protesting the fact that the war veterans are still
refusing to get off the farms they have occupied, which recent political
agreements have 'settled' they would no longer occupy -- and which the
government is doing little to remove them from. And of course the new,
large minority party, the Movement for Democratic Change, is not doing
anything to help President Mugabe's ruling party, Zanu-PF, to get out of
this political and fiscal morass.]
But Namibia had not really been in the news in the previous couple months
here in southern Africa, and I hadn't read anything besides a bit of the
Lonely Planet guide I'd been given in June (thanks Amos), so I came here
with little knowledge of what to be on the lookout for. [Recent discussions
with folks in South Africa indicate many know little about their northwest
border country, so I don't feel so bad anymore.] What I did know was that
the country had achieved independence in 1990, a few years before South
Africa (1994), and a few after Zimbabwe (1980) -- in a mostly peaceful
U.N.-led process.
Pretty much the only thing I remembered about that period was the small role
I had to play in the U.S. Episcopal Church's change of position vis-a-vis
the new democratic government. I started working for the national church's
office of Peace and Justice Ministries in September of 1989. And I must
admit that in a few short months, I thought I was doing a pretty incredible
job. About one month after I began working at "815" -- as people around the
church call it (based on its street address on Manhattan's Second Avenue,
naturally) -- the Berlin Wall came tumbling down. Ethan makes major headway
in addressing the Cold War conflict. A couple months later, Nelson Mandela
was released from prison, after 27 long years behind bars. Another historic
victory for Flad-man. So then came the process of implementing Namibian
independence...
The Peace and Justice office was (and is) responsible for monitoring the
entire church's rather large stock portfolio, with respect to a wide range
of social justice issues. Together with other church groups and socially
conscious investors, we would pressure multinational corporations whose
stocks we owned on a variety of topics. In the 1980's, the best-known topic
was the divestment movement, in which companies were pressured by activists
around the world to remove their operations from South Africa... and Namibia
as well (or what was then called South West Africa, which South Africa had
run for several decades). Our church, like several Protestant
denominations, had a policy statement that prevented us from owning shares
in corporations that were doing business in those two countries, based on
the international boycott. [In fact, I should add that the Episcopal
Church, USA was the sponsor of the very first socially-responsible
shareholder resolution: in 1972 we called on General Motors to disinvest
from its operations in South Africa. I'd also like to mention how surprised
I've been here in South Africa to learn some people had little to no
knowledge of the divestment movement.]
Well, to try to bring this long story to a close, in 1990 our church was
going to have to change its policy on Namibia -- now that it was a new,
democratic country, we naturally didn't want to maintain an outdated
position of keeping investments out of the country. So, on behalf of our
national Socially Responsible Investing committee, I wrote a short, simple
(imagine me writing something short...) draft of a resolution that would
change our policy statement. It was modified slightly, and went through the
appropriate channels, and became our new policy. Ethan makes good, once
again. [Granted, not quite as dramatic as getting that darned Berlin Wall
to fall, but not bad.]
So here in Namibia I set about trying to familiarize myself with this place.
Namibia's population is a lot smaller than I had imagined -- there are
only 1.7 million people. I was struck by the fact that the combined
population of it and its large geographic neighbor Botswana (which I'd
visited briefly early in the month, and also has less than 2 million
residents) is less than Soweto!! That's right, these millions of hectares
of land over two nations have a grand total of people that is less than one
former township region in the greater Johannesburg area. Whew. Obviously
the social, economic and political dynamics were going to be a bit different
there than in South Africa.
But yet, some of the challenges are indeed similar. Thanks to some
Namibian-supportive friends back in the U.S. (thanks Brian, Diane, and Bob &
Evie!!), and thanks to my host here, the administrator of the Anglican
Diocese of Namibia, Kelvin Adams, I was put into contact with a range of
church-based and NGO representatives. This range of local leadership shared
with me their concerns about unemployment and the economy, HIV/AIDS,
increasing crime, racial and ethnic tensions, political corruption, and the
tenuous process of moving from a liberation struggle to a government that
meets the needs of its entire people. I found the most comprehensive
overview of the numerous concerns facing Namibia's society and church
community outlined in a paper that one of my best contacts here, Christo
Lombard, wrote a couple years ago. Professor Lombard is the director of the
Ecumenical Institute for Namibia (EIN), based at the University of Namibia,
and since he's already written about the issues better than I could, I'm
going to plagiarize a couple paragraphs from him (should you do that from a
university professor?!). This is taken from the introduction of his essay,
"The Role of Religion in the Reconstruction of Namibian Society: The
Churches, the New Kairos, and Visions of Despair and Hope."
"As a background for the dilemmas which the Christian churches in Namibia
are facing currently, it is important to recall their strong prophetic stand
before independence, in defence of the right of the Namibian people to cast
off the shackles of apartheid rule and South African hegemony. Against this
background the current crisis, but also: opportunity, of the churches,
suddenly facing a totally new situation, a new kairos, can be portrayed to
some extent. The churches are now confronted with new realities such as a
popularly elected government within a 'unitary, democratic and secular
state.' Without proper preparation they are required to deal with a
complicated agenda, such as human rights abuses by the liberators, a new
situation of religious freedom, multi-culturalism and multi-faith education
in schools, and new challenges in the arena of civil society, such as:
gender equality, sexual orientation, corruption, nepotism, ongoing poverty
and unemployment, and integration of victims of the war. Suddenly, the
'kingly', 'priestly' and 'prophetic' ministries of the Church of Jesus
Christ have a totally new setting and orientation.
"...one can say the Namibian churches and society have been thrust into the
global village, where an international plan for peace and independence was
implemented successfully, but without the support of an established
democratic tradition; where racism has been constitutionally ousted, but
keeps coming back in all sorts of ethnic and cultural guises; where mission
and evangelization are to be redefined in terms of a secular state and real
religious freedom, within a predominantly hierarchical Christian tradition;
but also where special attention is needed for victims of war and newly
marginalised people, in a setting where the concept of *liberation* has not
yet been expanded to include social justice issues of 'land' and
'distribution of wealth,' let alone a culture of human rights."
Prof. Lombard indeed led me in the direction of some excellent human rights
contacts in the community, who I will discuss shortly. We talked at length
about some philosophical and political priorities for the relatively new
country, and the church's role in playing a part in the civic discourse. He
noted that the U.S. (where he has taken at least one teaching sabbatical,
back in 1989 at my childhood stomping grounds of Vassar College in
Poughkeepsie) is a completely legalized nation, in which the very values of
the country are put into law. He argued to me that our First Amendment
actually went too far, for two reasons. First, while he agreed that the
state shouldn't meddle in religion, the reverse was not true -- religious
traditions should be allowed to express their prophetic traditions within
the state. Second, he said it says religion shall be only an individual
expression; but most religious traditions are inherently a collective
experience. Finally, his analysis of the importance of the church's role in
the community noted that Jesus said that you need love as well as justice in
society; prophecy as well as law.
Christo described to me the four main goals of the EIN: (1) support
theological research, (2) to organize conferences on certain major themes,
(3) to stimulate ecumenical contact and support the work of the Council of
Churches of Namibia, and (4) to develop curricula for religious and moral
education throughout the school system. In this context, I learned that one
of his current primary areas of programmatic focus is on faith and the
environment. A growing field in my home country for the past decade, he is
one of many southern African religious scholars to take this on with new
insights. It was exciting to see how this movement is becoming a priority
for people of faith around the world, highlighting the connections between
God's creation and modern science. I offered to locate for his research and
curriculum development a couple of the resources I'd used back in the U.S.,
and his very positive acceptance of that suggestion made me feel I'd brought
something of value to that one area of work here.
This topic focus brought to mind several stories from my own occasionally
Zelig-like (or Forrest Gump, mayhap) background. Back in 1990-91, I had the
good fortune to join our Episcopal then-Presiding Bishop, Edmond Browning,
at part of a gathering of top-level religious leaders, scientists, and
legislative representatives. The meeting, which was kicked off at the
Museum of Natural History in New York City, had been convened by
then-Senator Al Gore (now-battling candidate for the Presidency),
internationally-renowned Carl Sagan (now-deceased), and then-Dean of the
Cathedral of St. John the Divine, James Parks Morton. That initial
philosophical exercise led into an ongoing project involving theologians,
scientific leaders, and members of the Washington DC community called the
National Religious Partnership for the Environment, with which I've had many
good opportunities to work.
On a slightly more negative side, I recalled my trip to the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development (popularly known as the Earth
Summit), back in June of 1992. This mammoth affair, which drew about 50,000
people from around the world to Rio de Janeiro for two weeks, taught me a
big lesson in showing up somewhere without having done enough legwork
beforehand. In Rio I learned that most of the work for these U.N.
conferences is done at the smaller working conferences held in the years
leading up to the high-profile event, which essentially serves to finalize
the agreements and publicize them. My biggest regret in Rio was not having
brought one of those life-size cardboard cutouts of our then President,
George Bush. Bush had expressed a hard-faced intransigence toward the
negotiations at the Earth Summit (for instance, toward the proposed
reductions in carbon dioxide emissions by developed nations, which would
play a large role in slowing down climate change worldwide), and any and all
activists there were vilifying him. So I wished I had thought to bring a
Bush replica, a Polaroid camera, and perhaps some rope - and with those
three items I could have made buckets of dough (pesados?) in a booth where
people could visit and have their picture taken strangling Eco-Enemy #1.
Bush did send his Vice President, J. Danforth Quayle, for a measly day or
two, one of two times I ran into the 'genius' conservative from Indiana
overseas that year. The other time was in December in San Salvador, at the
signing of the peace agreement between the El Salvadoran government and the
FMLN rebel forces. The Episcopal bishop there, the Right Rev. Martin
Barahona (a very nice man, committed to environmental and economic justice,
who I thought resembled a Latino Napoleon), had asked the U.S. Episcopal
Church to send a small delegation to stand in solidarity with the church
there at that important moment in the nation's history. I joined the Rev.
David Perry, Sonia Francis, the Rev. Ricardo Potter, and then-Panamanian
bishop James Ottley on a brief but powerful visit there. Being the only
member of the group who didn't speak Spanish, I felt quite the 'gringo,' one
of many times I've come to regret not taking it in college (my excuse was
that it was held at 9am EVERY day ALL year long, way too much of a
commitment for this late-riser).
It turned out that one of my other Namibian contacts had been at that very
same peace treaty ceremony! Back in April, when I first arrived in South
Africa, I had visited a food-training program in the Cape Flats area of
Langa with my Grace Cathedral group. There was another overseas group
enjoying lunch at the township-based vocational program that day, a large
crowd of U.S. college students who were visiting the Cape as part of their
semester abroad. I chatted with their program leader, an American named
Kevin Connors who was based in Windhoek, and told him that if I got to
Namibia I'd look him up. And so I did. When we talked more in Namibia, I
learned he had lived in El Salvador for six years, doing human rights work,
and had also been there at that historic moment.
Kevin and I hung out for the better part of an afternoon, and he brought me
to meet the cool staff of a gay and lesbian rights organization called The
Rainbow Project. They are doing their work in a tough climate, as Namibian
President Sam Nujoma has echoed the call of a couple of his African
counterparts (Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, as well as the Tanzanian president,
I believe) denigrating homosexuality as un-African, not to mention sinful.
Project director Ian and his assistant Britt, an American visiting for a
year, seemed to be in good spirits, however, and the fact they had recently
received a decent grant from a northern European NGO could have been the
reason. I'm hoping to use my Bay Area connections to send them one or two
resources in the future.
Namibia's more visible human rights issue related to the ongoing (lack of)
post-independence reconciliation process in the country. I met with several
people who expressed their concern with the government's increasing
autocratic tendencies and authoritarian tactics. On the one hand,
by-and-large Namibia is felt by the international community to have a
democratic government. Moreover, the fact that the ruling party of SWAPO
(the South West African People's Organization, the movement which led the
liberation struggle) won over 75% of the votes just a few months ago in the
national elections, lends one to believe that a clear majority of the
populace are comfortable with their current government. On the other, a
certain disparate stories are worth outlining, as they in different ways
give credence to the worries of this opposition.
First of all, Namibia's constitution had decreed that no president would
serve more than two five-year terms, when the democratic government took
office back in 1990. Last year, President Sam Nujoma convinced the
parliament to pass a 'one-time' amendment to the constitution, so that he
could run again - and he won, and this year began his third term of office.
Certainly this is a concern in a region where executives have been known to
do almost anything to maintain their power (with the striking exception of
Nelson Mandela's decision to step down after one term of office). In a
connected vein, I heard from more than one voice that the newly (re-)elected
government has called for stricter allegiance from its ministers of
parliament, not to mention the rank-and-file party members. [Now, with
SWAPO holding well over a two-thirds majority in the parliament, there is
cause to believe they can push through any sort of executive decisions
and/or constitutional amendments they choose.
SWAPO's dissatisfaction with internal criticism was made quite evident in
two stories making the headlines during my visit. One was the expulsion of
a foreign diplomat. In mid-July Finland's ambassador was told to leave the
country for what the government would only describe as 'undiplomatic
behavior.' Although Finland has been one of Namibia's main donors for the
past decade, according to the main English-language daily their ambassador
angered members of the Cabinet with his outspoken 'straight talk' about
Namibia's involvement in the regional war in the Congo. In a seemingly very
different world was the story about a musical group called 'Osire Stars.'
The popular band are refugees, and earlier this year were the darlings of
the political establishment as well, when they were hired to perform at the
10th anniversary of independence celebrations. However, they made the grave
error of performing in June at an event organized by a leading opposition
party, and hence became persona(s) non grata: all of a sudden the government
indicated that refugees had no right to speak politically (setting off a
huge legal and judicial debate, as you might imagine).
All of these issues interrelated with the most controversial one brought to
my attention - the call for the government to admit its wrongdoings in the
liberation struggle by: (1) acknowledging its use of torture and other human
rights violations, (2) apologizing to people it held in detention during
that period, on whom many of those abhorrent practices were used, (3)
clearing their tainted names from what SWAPO had accused to be spies and
dissidents, and (4) identifying what has happened to the hundreds of person
who are still missing, and presumed to be either dead or still in unknown
prison locations. This effort, which began all the way back in 1989-90
during the transition period to independence, gained momentum in the
mid-90's when a book was published by a Lutheran pastor named Groth about
many of the ex-detainees. It spurred the creation of the 'Breaking the Wall
of Silence' (BWS) movement, a dedicated group of people who refuse to let
SWAPO cover up this issue.
The BWS focus on bringing these stories to light is especially interesting
when viewed in the context of efforts around southern Africa to achieve
'reconciliation.' Roger Key, the dean of St. George's Cathedral in
Windhoek, gave me a helpful overview on this overarching theme by lending me
his copy of a four-part documentary series called 'Landscape of Memory.'
These four half-hour videos look at this topic in the post-war societies of
Namibia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and South Africa. [I highly recommend it,
though at the moment I'm not sure how to get a copy.] Many of you have at
least some minimal level of knowledge of the work of the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, which over the past four years
has brought to light the outrageous atrocities committed by both sides - but
particularly those perpetrated by the former apartheid government - in the
liberation conflict here. Namibia had no such process, and the
constitutional government simply called for reconciliation by moving forward
together. It is clear that will be impossible for many members of the
country until the wrongs that were done are acknowledged publicly. Unlike
in South Africa, there is not currently a call for reparations for those who
have been abused. Rather, the desire is to clear the names of those who
have been stained by this political and ideological conflict, and to
identify in a public arena what has happened to those still missing, so that
the community may move forward together.
Two leaders of the BWS movement spent significant amounts of time with me:
its first chairperson Samson Ndeikwila, and his successor Pauline Dempers.
Each of them shared a great deal of their moving personal stories, which
involved detention, torture, and political oppression, and highlighted the
ways in which BWS is trying to move forward in its ongoing campaign of
consciousness-raising and political criticism. Two of their top objectives
in the coming months are to finish an Oshiwambo translation of the book by
Pastor Groth (which was translated into Afrikaans shortly after its German
and English editions were published), and to commence an extensive oral
history project, by videotaping torture victim survivors and other
ex-detainees. [They just recently received the donation of a video camera
to assist this process, and are in need of some technical assistance to kick
off the project, not to mention creating documentaries out of the filming.
Anyone with such expertise that would welcome a short-term opportunity to
support this effort, please contact me.] The sensitive nature of their
work, and the government's 'unhappiness' with it (to put it kindly), was
made quite evident in a downtown coffee shop, when a CIA-type security agent
sat directly above us during our one-on-one conversation - making no real
effort to hide his disdainful watching and listening.
Those interesting connections led me to others, of course. I mentioned
earlier of the partnership between the EIN and Council of Churches in
Namibia (CCN). Christo has worked particularly closely with the CCN over
the past couple months on the Jubilee 2000 campaign. Together they put
together some resources for local churches to educate and organize around
the international debt crisis, and in a few short weeks they had gathered
several thousand signatures to send to the G-8 Summit in Okinawa. Christo
expressed great pride in the quick response to that call, as signing
petitions like that one is not any sort of a 'cultural tradition' in
Namibia. Of course, at the same time he expressed strong disappointment
(but not surprise) at the results of the Summit, where no real progress was
made toward debt relief, despite the high hopes on that issue beforehand. I
was set up with a brief meeting with the general secretary of the CCN, the
Rev. Nangula Kathindi, an Anglican priest. Just a couple minutes after we
started chatting, we realized we had met, years ago! She remembered our
time together back at the 1991 General Convention in Phoenix, Arizona, as we
met through our mutual friends Brian Grieves and Emma Mashinini. I had
recognized her face, but her memory was MUCH better than mine. In addition
to talking about the Jubilee 2000 campaign, she outlined some of the other
challenges facing the church and society, specifically: the ongoing Angolan
conflict; the growing problem of land mines throughout the Angolan border
region; and the rapidly increasing HIV/AIDS epidemic.
I was also put in touch with Mr. Uhuru Dempers (Pauline's brother), who is
the executive director of the Namibian Non-Governmental Organizations Forum
(NANGOF). It was formed in the early 1990's when many NGO's expressed a
need for increased networking among their membership. They work primarily
to support efforts for the poor and marginalized - especially turning NGO's
from historic service delivery work (now that the government is playing a
larger role in that capacity) to advocacy efforts. They also prioritize
capacity-building for the NGO community, leading workshops and doing
training in a range of key areas for about 85 affiliated organizations that
are trying to build up the civil society in the country. In that light,
Uhuru echoed the criticism about the government's growing culture of
intolerance. He indicated that governmental representatives have become
increasingly antipathetic toward those institutions which have criticized
the SWAPO leadership on certain policies (for instance its decisions to send
military troops into Angola and the Democratic Republic of the Congo); and
he cited the weakening political opposition in the country as a primary
reason the NGO community indeed needs to serve as strong watchdogs.
I had met a couple months ago in East London with a couple people involved
in similar NGO networking roles in the Eastern Cape, and they had expressed
grave concern about the financial situation of many of their member
organizations. That led me to ask Uhuru about funding, and he spoke
seriously on this issue. He noted that in 1990-91, the first year of their
independence, the Bank of Namibia (which holds all bank accounts for NGO's
operating in the country) reported that those organizations received from
outside funders a total of Nam$70 million. Four years later, in
1994-95, that amount had basically dropped in half to Nam$38 million. Many
NGO's closed their doors in the first half of the decade, and a top priority
for NANGOF's work is helping their members with organizational and financial
'sustainability' - in particular, trying to draw on the expertise of
overseas partners to help local NGO's learn diverse fundraising practices.
The role of the overseas community was highlighted in one issue that really
raised Uhuru's passions: land reform. This surprised me, since in a fairly
large country with less than two million people, I hadn't expected land to
be a big concern. However, he stated that the land issue is actually WORSE
in his country than in Zimbabwe, where the conflict (as previously reported)
has received all of the world's attention in recent months. Uhuru outlined
the stark disparity: less than 4000 white landowners control over 70% of the
land in this country. The only way this can change is by those few owners
choosing to turn over their lands to the government, because the
'reconciliation' process of independence (and the succeeding constitution)
has prevented any private property to be expropriated. The government, with
all its challenges, clearly doesn't have the money to purchase these lands
at what the owners claim are its 'market value,' so the situation has become
a sort of a Catch-22. It is his opinion that the legacy of the colonial
history of the land that in fact REQUIRES Western governments and
institutions to provide money to help this redistribution process. He saw
this as a key responsibility of developed countries: to help redress the
situation that they have caused over the past decades. With the knowledge
that the government has taken out many 'soft money' loans in recent years,
he is also worried that this assistance needs to come before international
financial institutions arrive in Namibia to force the restructuring of its
economic policies, which they have done to devastating effects in other
African countries.
Uhuru's final point was on the importance of the religious community. Like
several others, he feels that the churches are among the only remaining
'mass institutions' that have the capacity to mobilize people in communities
throughout the society. Like Christo, in particular, he believes the
churches have failed to live up to its prophetic legacy in recent years, and
that it needs to take on this role in a range of critical issues. In
talking with several people it seems obvious to me that the churches in
Namibia have entered the same somewhat 'dangerous' point of tension that we
have dealt with back in the U.S. in recent years. On the one hand, the
ecumenical and interfaith organizations are directed by their membership to
serve as 'facilitating' groups, not as programmatic ones, and to let the
member churches take on the latter task. But on the other, most of the
members are not actually willing to do that, for either financial reasons or
the concern about being too 'political.' It is a hard issue, and I hope
that the community in Namibia can handle it better than we have in the U.S.
(where ecumenical agencies have been slashed to skeleton staffs over the
past couple decades).
************
On Friday the 14th, I set off in a tiny rental car for the north of Namibia.
Shortly after my departure from Windhoek, I came upon a police roadblock
on the highway -- it was a checkpoint that seemed to be of special
importance at that time, when a group of Namibian war veterans had marched
all the way down toward the capital from the north. They were protesting
the government's lack of support (financial and otherwise) to them, a decade
after independence. Everyone here was a bit nervous about what they might
do, as the land occupations in Zimbabwe by their war veterans have had a
ripple effect throughout the region. The police officer who peered into my
car asked me where I was going: "Tsumeb," I said. Then, in an accent I
found it hard to distinguish, he asked me where I was from. "The United
States," I answered. To which he said, "U.S. dollars." "Dollars?"
"Dollars, ...ollars," he repeated -- but the more he spoke, the more
confused I got, and by then I thought he was asking what the U.S. colors
were -- so happily I responded, "red, white, and blue!" "No, US dollars,"
he said once again, making it quite clear what he was seeking. I was a bit
flustered, and started looking around my car for a bag in which I might have
a buck to appease the insistent security officer. Luckily, as this Abbott &
Costello exchange was taking place, 2-3 other cars had pulled in behind me,
waiting to go through the checkpoint. And as one of his colleagues walked
over to help deal with the growing backlog, he decided to wave me through.
Hmmn.
I arrived a few hours later in Tsumeb, a fairly tourist-centered town in the
north, which serves as the primary point of entry for many foreigners to the
huge animal-centric Etosha National Park. An hour or so later, I met the
diocesan bishop, the Right Rev. Shihala Hemepembe, and accompanied him to a
large regional gathering of the Anglican Mother's Union that was taking
place in town. We stayed for about a half hour, long enough for him to
offer greetings to the big assembly -- and me too. Unfortunately, we left
thereafter, because I learned later that the mothers had slain a fresh goat
for dinner, in honor of the bishop's visit. Instead, I feasted on a lame,
cold sandwich purchased from the only deli-type store open after 5pm on
Friday in town. [I can't really complain. I think back to my sister
Krista's beautiful wedding, at which the main course was a fantastic curried
goat dish, which I thoroughly enjoyed. As did almost everyone else, with
the embarrassing exception of Krista and her husband Chris, who had been
locked up in a photo shoot that lasted about 90 minutes. Oops. I'm still
sorry, Kris!]
A bit before 6 the next morning the bishop picked me up, and along with two
other passengers we headed off on a 3 & 1/2 hour drive northeast to the town
of Rundu. In the car, the bishop asked me, "Did you visit the U.S. embassy
in Windhoek, and tell them you would be coming up here?" I replied that I
had not, and asked whether I should have done so. He told me that the U.S.
government (and several other "Western" countries) had directed their
citizens to stay away from the Angolan border region, as the internal war is
continuing there (and occasionally spills over into northern Namibia).
Since Rundu was right at the border, the embassy would have told me to stay
away. Just as well that I didn't pay them a visit, then.
As we drove up the bishop had a cassette tape playing in the car -- and
unfortunately only had one tape, I would add. I must have heard the
entirety of that tape at least six times on the way up and back. Apparently
one of his kids had made it of some recent R&B songs, and having listened to
it and having seen a lot of videos recently, I'm convinced that R&B is in a
sad state. Yech. [I mean, the 'Thong Song'??!! Come ON!] The funniest
thing about it was the fact that I was in a car with a distinguished man of
"the cloth," and there were these songs with terrible curses & lyrics. It
sort of cracked me up, when I wasn't cringing. Listening to it over and
over reminded me of when my homegirl Meredith got her hair braided one time
up on 126th Street in Harlem, and had this horrible experience. Not only
did she not like the final product, and not only did it take over 6 hours
(at least 2-3 hours longer than it should have), but she had to listen to
some sappy Whitney Houston tape about 25 times. Apparently it (similarly)
was the only music they had available. Bummer.
That story also brings to mind my worst fear. All those of you who have
read George Orwell's "1984" probably mulled over what your most heinous
moment would be, based on that omniscient government's ability to exploit
each person's greatest fear (doesn't the image of the rats in the cage
around the man's head just stick with you?). In the mid-80's I became
convinced that my worst-case scenario would be a cassette player strapped to
my head with the song "We Built This City (on Rock & Roll)" playing
constantly... it seemed to be on the radio every 5 minutes, and I despised
it every time (maybe that is why I hardly ever listen to the radio
nowadays). In Connecticut we suffered the additional ignominy of an
inserted phrase, "We Built HARTFORD on Rock & Roll" thrown in on the
regular, by that voice many of you used to hear in advertisements for the
monthly Monster Truck road shows (catering to the elite of our society).
These two long drives, to Rundu and back, also made me think about some
other bishops-in-cars stories. My favorite one was told to me by Stephen
and Michael Perry, friends from way back in Po-town, who I've happily
reconnected with the past few years in the Bay Area. Their dad, David (hi
Ricki & David!), is a priest (and, naturally, a card-carrying member of the
PeeWee Herman Fan Club), and was serving at the time at All Saints' Church
in Pasadena, California, I believe. Archbishop Desmond Tutu made a visit to
Los Angeles, and for some unknown reason Stephen (I think) was called upon
to pick him up from the airport in his small, teenage-influenced, dirty car.
[Anyone who's ever encountered Tutu has a favorite story about him; this
is mine.] Now for some completely unknown reason, Bp. Tutu sat in the back
seat of Stephen's small car -- apparently there was someone important enough
to sit in the other front seat, instead of Tutu (?!). After he sat down, he
looked down at the car floor, as there was a crunching sound underneath his
feet. In that voice that only Desmond Tutu has, and which all of you who
have heard him will appreciate, he reached down and said, "Are THEEEZ potato
CHEEPS?!" [Which, picking some of the dirty semi-food items up in his hand,
they clearly were.] Now THAT is what I call a VIP escort service.
The other story that came to mind was the time I attended a meeting of the
international Anglican Peace and Justice Network in the Philippines, back in
late 1992. We spent several days in Manila (which is where the
previously-recorded "Hey, Joe!" story came from), and then headed north into
the rural Mountain Province, to a tiny village named Sagada. The
Philippines were in the middle of not one, but three different internal
military conflicts at that time. There was the Muslim separatist movement
in the south, which continues to this day (as you all know from those
hostages who have been kept there for the past several months). There were
a number of kidnappings and so forth by right-wing former members of the
military, who were seeking to fatten their pockets in the slightly less
corrupt post-Marcos era. And up in the northern mountains, leftist
guerrillas had been fighting against the government for years. Since the
north was where the Episcopal Church was based, our Christian brothers and
sisters there had been playing a central role in trying to mediate the
conflict between the two forces.
Now, I think that 15 of us from around the world were crammed into this
small (kombi-style) van for the long drive up. We left about 5:30 in the
morning, and we didn't get to the start of the mountainous area until about
4pm -- after a day-long journey of swerving back & forth on the so-called
"highway" (two lanes, one going north and one south) to avoid all the rice
that was put out on the road to dry by farmers from the omnipresent rice
fields. Somewhere in the middle of the day our teenage driver discovered
that there was no radiator cap in our van. Not good. And especially bad
when we started the dusk-then-dark climb into the mountains, on a one-lane
dirt road without any lights (of course not, there were no humans anywhere,
why would you need lights?), where we could frequently hear the dirt falling
away from the road -- to what? We spent the next seven hours singing
whatever came to people's minds, to keep our minds off the sound of the
disappearing road beneath us, and the occasional set of headlights that
emerge right in front of us as we came around a mountain bend -- at which
point our two vehicles would have to find a way to squeeze by one another.
We arrived near midnight, and the next morning when we woke up and realized
how high up we were, I know we were all glad that we hadn't seen what we had
been driving along (expect the driver, perhaps). And I will admit that I
have been convinced ever since that God had decided to keep us alive simply
because there were too many bishops in that van to let die together. I
mean, think of all the elections and politicking that would have to have
been done around the world if we had all perished!
One of the members of the episcopacy that was in the van was the Right Rev.
Jonothan Arinzechukwu Onyemelukwe. Bishop Jonothan, who insisted that he
was from the Diocese ON the Niger (not of), was a very funny character. His
various stories also helped to keep our minds off of the journey, and my
best memory was when he shared the tale of a phone call he made once to the
U.S. It was a person-to-person call, so the operator needed his name. He
said it, and was asked to repeat it. Which he did, and the operator, still
not getting the "Arinzechukwu Onyemelukwe" part through his distinct
Nigerian accent, requested that he spell it. His response: "It is spelled
just as it sounds." Exactly! Nothing could have been more to the point.
So, back to Africa! We did make it to Rundu, despite the music, and I
attended a confirmation service there. For a while it appeared that I would
be stuck outside the corrugated-metal church, as about 10 of us hung around
the front door for about 20 minutes. I was well occupied, however, by the
Hon. Willie Brown. An older well-dressed fellow by the name of Petrus, who
looked like a stunt double for San Francisco's infamous mayor, chatted me up
for a good 15 minutes. I did take a photo of Willie/Petrus, and you Bay
Area folks will have to tell me if I'm right (OK, he wasn't wearing a hat,
but everything else looked similar). At the end of the three-hour service,
which was all offered in Oshiwambo, I was asked to bring greetings from the
U.S. The bishop was fairly impressed that I referred to his sermon in my
short speech, which he translated for the congregation. I had listened
intently to his sermon, and, not understanding Oshiwambo, practically the
only word that I could identify as having an obviously English connection
was "catholic." So, naturally, I talked about catholicity -- how the
(worldwide) catholic aspect of the Anglican Church had brought me to visit
them.
Afterward we were treated to a wonderful luncheon, which was highlighted by
their cultural staple of "oshifima" (or "sima"), which is a "sadza"-like
food (see my previous email report from Zimbabwe) -- but is made of millet,
instead of mealie-meal (corn). When we sat down, the bishop asked me if I'd
ever eaten with my hands - ha; he should ask my mother! "You betcha," I
replied... in slightly more formal language, of course. And following the
lead of others, I proceeded to pull balls of the burning hot oshifima out of
the big hunk, and dip them into the vat of chicken & gravy. Yum! [As they
say here - not.]
The next day, back in Tsumeb, I attended another confirmation service, as
presided by the bishop. This one was larger and longer, going over 4 hours.
At the end, I once again brought the obligatory greetings from the U.S.
After I finished, a fellow who I'd sat next to the whole service, who looked
just like Ossie Davis (but this time I have no photo to prove it), also
spoke. Apparently he was another special guest, though he'd clearly been
there before. He talked first in the local language, and then spoke briefly
in English, directed toward me. Said Ossie to the naive U.S. visitor, in
front of several hundred folks, "This is a peaceful country. Your
government should not tell you to not come here to visit us." [Summary
version.] Well, he's right, and then he's not. In the newspapers over the
next week it emerged that three separate cross-border attacks took place in
the northeast, purportedly by either Angolan government forces or UNITA
rebels -- one of which was actually in Rundu the very weekend I visited
there!
This little speech I received was an example to me of the denial that I feel
some people are in about their situation (and I'm not talking about a river
elsewhere on this continent). Most are simply frustrated. It is ten years
after Namibian independence, and a lot of the population is distressed that
they have not been able to completely emerge from the legacy of violent
conflict, despite their best hopes. As a couple politically minded people
noted to me, a central issue that many people refuse to acknowledge is the
role that their own government has played in exacerbating this conflict.
The SWAPO government made an "executive" decision last year to fund the
Angolan government's campaign to "wipe out UNITA" (following the lead of
Zimbabwe's president Robert Mugabe, who called on all his southern African
partners to put troops and money into the Congo and Angolan conflicts), and
ever since that point the problems in the border region have increased
exponentially.
This problem was best exemplified in the next community I visited, the
following day. I drove 3 1/2 hours from Tsumeb to Odibo, a border village
that is basically entirely Anglican. This small mission community features
an important medical center, which services rural residents on both sides of
the impoverished border region, a secondary school, and of course a large
church (which confirms about 300-600 new communicants each year drawn from
its numerous nearby outposts).
Odibo is struggling, though -- especially its school. Due to the war, the
school -- which was, I believe, the only English-language secondary school
in the country for most of the 1970's/80's -- moved about 20 kilometers away
in the mid-80's, to an isolated community. Last year the decision was made
to finally move it back to its home of Odibo: after all, the country was
almost a decade into independence, and nothing had happened at any point in
the 90's in that area, so the school should reclaim its place by the border.
Less than two months after the school reopened in Odibo, at the beginning
of this year, an attack took place in that area by UNITA rebels. Apparently
they had decided to target medical centers located along the border, to gain
valuable medical supplies for their ongoing guerrilla war. In response, the
U.S. and other "Western" governments pulled away from the border all
volunteers who are citizens of their countries (and made the
now-known-to-Flad directive that we should stay away from there altogether).
Odibo's school thereby lost three volunteer teachers, who were running
three essential courses (for the high school students who are determined to
pass their matric examinations, anyway): English, math, and natural
sciences. The school has been unable to replace these teachers since March,
partly because it is hard to find available teachers with those specialties,
and partly because they can't afford to pay much -- the volunteers were
serving basically free of charge, after all. Many of the students have
since left the school, realizing that they cannot at this time get the
quality education they want at St. Mary's.
The medical center itself has many challenges, particularly funding (big
surprise). The clinic's facilities are decades old, and no amount of
patchwork fixing of the walls and ceilings (the way my family is used to
dealing with the plaster constantly falling in our old 1892 Victorian house)
is going to bring the buildings to the point of true quality care. One of
my generous hostesses there was a woman named Nancy; she is the only white
person who lives in the community -- into which she was born the child of
missionaries, and where she plans to live the rest of her life. Her late
husband put together a comprehensive three-stage renovation proposal for the
medical center a couple years ago. The plans will have the main building
knocked down and replaced by a modern out-patient and primary health care
facility, reflecting its significant role in the region. In my visit around
their facilities, I saw how important even the final stage of the proposal
will be -- as it includes building an up-to-date laundry room, a desperate
need for a hospital where I witnessed a woman cleaning most of the laundry
by hand, while standing next to the one small washing machine they own. The
proposal is estimated to cost several million Namibian dollars, and at the
moment they are required to raise 50% of the budget from outside sources
(which will be matched by funds from their government -- a not entirely
unfair system, given the fact that the government covers the cost of their
salaries, medicines, and most other day-to-day expenses).
The other major expenditure facing St. Mary's medical center is that of
getting a new "ambulance." Now I have to put that word in quotes, because
their version of an ambulance is not that which most of us in the U.S. would
recognize. It is a 4x4 vehicle, designed to navigate the treacherous rural
roads and landscape. Luckily, I visited them in the winter (again, a winter
where the average daily temperature was about 80-fahrenheit -- making me
quite glad I didn't come in the scorching, humid, mosquito &
malaria-infested summertime!), since the rainy season is several months
away. Then the roads are normally impassable, except by a 4-wheel drive
vehicle -- so what they use as an ambulance is basically a jeep. Their
ambulance driver has apparently put about 300,000 bumpy, clutch-eating
kilometers on their most recent version in the past two years alone, and for
this reason and the fact that they want to start sending their nurses OUT
into the communities to deliver health care TO the rural people (rather than
waiting for the sick folks to get to the clinic) they badly need new
transport.
Perhaps the toughest part of my trip to the north, though, was my
corresponding internal journey. Everywhere I went people would ask,
naturally, 'Why are you here?' The harsh reality was that very few people
from the U.S. come to that region, and those that do are usually either (1)
serving as long-term volunteers, and/or (2) bringing funds. I did not fit
into either of those historic boxes, which confused many peopleÖ and
increasingly myself. I felt that I was coming: to learn about the issues
affecting the communities in that part of the world, hopefully to share some
of those key learnings with a broader group of relatively concerned people
back 'home,' and to simply 'be' and worship with Anglican sisters and
brothers from a different part of the world. But it was not that easy.
There are two interrelated issues that I wrestled with, and continue to
ponder. First, what was I bringing? In a sense, I was 'taking' from those
communities - intellectual knowledge, and personal stories, but perhaps not
offering much in return. Second, the perception of people from the U.S.
being either (1) sources of funds and/or volunteer labor, or (2) tourists
who go to see the wildlife and avoid the people - and nothing in between.
Part of the dilemma was that I had written to the Anglican diocese several
months previously, indicating that I intended to make a brief visit of two
to four weeks, and inquiring as to whether I could do any helpful voluntary
work during the stay. The response was to indeed come to visit, but that
setting up a volunteer role would be next to impossible, due to the
government's stringent regulations and paperwork on creating such jobs
(fairly correctly, it reasons that almost any work should be handled my the
large number of unemployed in the country, not by outsiders). Conversely,
upon my arrival almost everyone I communicated with urged me to visit
certain tourist-dominated parts of the country, to immerse myself in its
beauty and ecological diversity. And since the volunteer idea had fallen
through, it was arranged that I would spend several days 'in nature.' As
you can see, what I had originally intended was not what I ended up doing -
and by gravitating toward the 'box' that has been defined for many overseas
visitors, and was the description that I had wanted to avoid. It was a bit
frustrating.
What is wrong with being a tourist? I mulled that over. Perhaps being a
'real tourist' would be better than what I was doing. After all, a tourist
puts money into the economy, thereby helping to create jobs in an
economically depressed climate. I, on the other hand, was looking to 'take
things out' of the community, at a certain level, without putting much back
in - except perhaps a brief relationship. I think there is a middle ground,
but the dichotomy consumed my mind for several days.
'At the end of the day,' as they love to say down here, I did indeed proceed
on my merry way to being a full-fledged tourist. I left Odibo in search of
game. Big game. My drive from Odibo southward to the Etosha National Park
was indeed marked by lots of game viewing -- but not of the species I was
seeking. Throughout my drive I constantly had to slow to a crawl to avoid
the herds of cattle, goats, and donkeys who meandered across the highway, at
their own pace -- that is, assuming they were moving at all. Sometimes they
preferred to stand in place, and stare at the oncoming moving vehicle with
that "Yeah, what? Go ahead, just TRY to hit me, dumb human" look which so
many have perfected. Most of the cows, in particular, reminded me of
members of San Francisco's infamous monthly bike ride, Critical Mass.
During that regular last-Friday-of-the-month gathering, where hundreds of
cyclists gather to enjoy pedalling through our city's lovely hills (pant
gasp), a main (if unwritten) objective is to wreak havoc on the start of the
weekend's commuter traffic. Therefore, after a short while, the bicyclists
cease to obey traffic rules, and begin to intentionally stop car traffic --
one or two persons will strategically place themselves in the path of the
oncoming cars, whilst all the other cyclists (the peleton?) zoom by
unimpeded.
Soon enough I had managed to arrive at Namutoni campsite in the park (well,
almost 4 hours later, thanks to the cattle), and I commenced my 3-night stay
at one of Africa's largest and best-known game reserves. As I drove into
the park, a giraffe peered over the top of some trees along the roadside,
and I knew I'd come to the right place. Over the next few days, as I drove
around this huge preserve, giraffes were often my salvation. I think there
often an expectation that these preserves are simply large zoos, and that
wherever you go you will find an animal waiting for you. Wrong. I had
hours of time to myself, without a fellow animal to share the moment. But
invariably a giraffe would appear, breaking the mammal-less moment, and
cementing its place in my heart as my favorite animal. 'Why?' you might be
asking (doubtful, but you might!). Well, several reasons. Certainly there
is the ability to actually see the giraffe, a not-unimportant issue for a
fellow who is driving on his own, and doesn't have an extra pair of eyes to
take up the lookout position for animals. Of course there is also the
physical resemblance -- tall, skinny, long neck, big eyelashes(?!).
Most of all, though, I think of the giraffe in the context of the time I
submitted it as a suggested symbol for a political party. A few years ago a
Washington DC-based progressive/ activist church colleague shared with me
some information about an emerging U.S. political party. It was called,
simply enough, the New Party, and it was a coalition of labor,
environmental, and poverty activists from around the country. Unlike some
other left-of-center attempts to build a new political agenda, this one had
a very small national role (at least at that time) and was concentrating its
efforts in local communities -- on school boards and city councils (just
like the right-wing Christian Coalition had done, so successfully, in
previous years). According to its literature, it was building a remarkable
track record of local victories, and I recognized the names of some of its
leadership as respected activists. I put myself on its mailing list, and a
few months later their newsletter announced they had grown big enough that
they needed to choose a national symbol -- like the elephant for the
Republican Party, and the donkey for the Democrats. So they were putting a
call out to their membership to submit ideas for the symbol.
Well, naturally I sent one in. Not only that, it showed up in a succeeding
issue of the newsletter, with about 7-9 other populist-inspired submissions,
for people to vote on. There were some weird ideas (the rock), and some
clever ones (most notably, the genius that dreamed up the gnu -- get it?
The New/ Gnu Party?!). But I liked mine -- the giraffe. My reasons?
Because the giraffe stands "head and shoulders" over its counterparts, 'just
like the New Party does,' and because the New Party's 'multi-colored
alliance is reflected in the giraffe's patchwork coat.' Or something to
that effect... I never found out what the final decision was (maybe the
leadership didn't like the vote results!), but I had that brief moment in
the sun. [NB: the New Party has since fallen a bit in my eyes due to their
mistreatment of my cousin Isabel during her employ as one of their local
organizers. We'll see if they can get their act together.]
The most visible animal at Etosha was the impala -- just like in my visit to
South Africa's Umfolozi-Hluhlue park in back in May (I can hear some of
y'all 'Spirit' folks groaning right now). The impala, a small antelope, is
apparently a prolific reproductive species (and unlike other regional member
of the deer family, you never really see impala on dinner menus -- so I
guess that's another reason it survives so well). There were long stretches
of time without even an impala or a giraffe, though. While tourists to
Etosha are often "promised" certain animals by the names of the places you
would visit (for instance, Eland Drive, or Rhino Way), they were clearly
mislabelled (or hopelessly optimistic) names. So I began re-naming the
paths with titles like "Just Dust Drive," and "Ain't Nobody Here But Us
Lonely Impala Way."
Being on my own, and wanting to remain as quiet as my small Toyota Corolla
could be in the bush (i.e., no radio), I was obviously left with a lot of
time to think. Now, this can be a dangerous thing. As many friends will
testify, not to mention my family, my mind often works in strange ways.
Back at Wesleyan, I used to sit in the Mocon dining hall with Bobbito,
Brother Earl, Dwight D-Lux, and other friends, and we would play word
association, for hours on end (it was certainly better than eating lots of
the Mocon food). And I would always get accused of going off track. [For
example, someone says Albert Einstein; after which another says Marv Albert;
then I say Dutch. Why? Well, Marv Albert brings to mind toupee. Toupee
sounds just like two-pay. And when two pay, it's going Dutch. Right? Stay
with me!] So as you can see, it wasn't that I was going off-track; I was
just jumping too far ahead. My mind was on the express train instead of the
local.
One thing that occupied my fitful, foolish, and often feeble mind during
these hours of "quiet" time was making up new songs. I'm used to trying to
'make the music with your mouth' state of mind, as Biz Markie once crowed.
My first and only car (to date) was a 1982 Honda Accord I'd dubbed 'Zizou'
in honor of the captain of France's national soccer team, Zinedine Zidane,
possibly the best player in the world over the past three years (Vive les
Bleus!). I drove poor Zizou for the past four years into its death, and for
most of that time lacked the comfort of a radio (my own fault, as I'd lost
the pop-top, uh-duh). So as I wandered around Etosha's expansive savannah,
I was inspired by the memory of several creative Wes friends (Wadhwa,
Hlinko, Mullaney, Neidell, etc.) who penned the Grammy-deserving "Olin
Library," sung to the tune of "Copacabana" our frosh year. [Their other
major achievement that year was the invention of Shoe Golf, an outstanding
gender-neutral sport which has been exported to at least 13 countries,
according to Alex's report at our 10th reunion last June. Watch out for it
at the 2004 Olympics!] Over the next few days I hummed and sang a veritable
collection of self-taught recordings. Like it or not, I will share with you
a few of my favorites -- see if you can figure out the original songs,
before I give them:
- You are My Giraffe, My Only Giraffe -- OK, that's one of the easy ones:
You Are My Sunshine
- From a Distance (You Look Like a Cat) -- sung to, easy again, From a
Distance -- a testimony to all the trees that I discovered were in
animal-shaped camouflage disguises
- It's an Impala, Another Impala -- sung to You're My Obsession
- One Lonely Gemsbok -- to One Night in Bangkok (!)
- Okaukeujo's Lonely Driving Man -- I'm sure a few of you know this one --
Sgt. Pepper's LonelyÖ
- Bloody Impala -- sung to (I'm going to destroy the title of this Jewish
folk song), Havah Nagila (?!?) - the word 'pretty' or 'lonely' may be
substituted for 'bloody,' depending on one's mood upon sight of the animal,
of course
- Throw Your Horns in the Air! -- for all the hard-core hip-hop heads,
straight from the Onyx classic, just substitute guns for horns (and since
the long-horned gemsbok is also known as the Oryx, this came especially to
mind; I've even thought of the album title, Bacdabokup)
- Showin' the Butt -- the part of the zebra most often seen, drawn from what
all of you Spike Lee fans should remember from "School Daze" -- the dance
scene that featured Doin' the Butt
- Winter for Rhino in Etosha -- a testimony to the terrible song from Mel
Brooks' classic movie "The Producers," with its incredibly written
"Springtime for Hitler and Germany"
The Mel Brooks reference above brings me to a couple other points. His
oh-so tongue-in-cheek musical scenes were about the only ones I could
stomach when it came to musicals. As my long-time friend Alan (Yan) knows,
as a rule I don't like them. He and I had only one basic apartment law of
mutual respect through over three years of being roommates: he didn't play
musicals, and I didn't play Public Enemy (simple enough). But there is one
musical that I always loved: 'The Sound of Music.' [And I liked it BEFORE,
as a kid I met Julie Andrews backstage after her performance in Peter Pan,
just to keep things clear.] So to top off my list of original tunes, I'm
offering a few special songs derived from that great soundtrack:
Doe, a Bok, a Female Bok - I'm trusting you know the original
I am a Human; You are an Elephant -- I am 16, you are 17
And finally, for the grand finale, my ode to the Austrian national anthem --
Wildebeest, Wildebeest (Love My Savannah Forever)
Mel, genius that he is, inspired me to think of many things. Choosing my
top flicks of all time was another way I wasted away hours of lonely time.
Now, granted, my top choices are films that many of you might call "bad" -
yeah, whatever! Most importantly, these are the movies from which I can
pull a quote at the drop of a pun: Hollywood Shuffle; This is Spinal Tap;
Monty Python's The Holy Grail; The Muppet Movie; Wayne's World; Happy
Gilmore; Blazing Saddles; Fletch. Bad comedic movies such as these also
came to mind as I struggled to put up the tent each night. Growing up, the
Flads went camping almost every summer, and we would erect one of those huge
prehistoric tents (with about 40 poles and endless yards of canvas) in
various KOA sites around the east coast. Back in 1984 my family went all
out, though, taking a six-week journey around North America, our version of
the 'National Lampoon's Summer Vacation.' The best summary was, I think, my
younger sister Maggie's comment, somewhere around Oregon, "We should have
filmed this."
Another distinct memory from those long family trips emerged as I attempted
to take photographs with my cheap $10 camera that I bought in South Africa
(possibly the worst thing to happen on this trip, thus far, was when my
half-decent camera broke back in May). Both of my parents have had stints
as amateur photographers. I'll always be grateful to Mom for taking up the
practice, since she recorded some of my most memorable teenage moments. But
DadÖ aaah, Dad. As all my siblings will readily attest, our father was
always intent on taking photos of things NO one else would. Specifically,
while most people around the world use their cameras to record images they
find beautiful, our Dad stopped (over and over) in the middle of our drives
to pictorialize that which was most ugly. As an environmental geographer,
one of Dad's passions has been to highlight the urban blight that has crept
over the land, so he collects images of massive power lines running through
previously pristine landscapes, and so forth. Now, to get back to the
themes of bad puns (how could I ever leave that?) and movies, I am compelled
to share with you the title that I offered (freely!) my pops for his second
book. As the set up, you have to know that the cover of his first book on
the topic had some of those aforementioned huge power structures, which to
me look very similar to various war machines used by the evil empire in
George Lucas' best-selling films. Therefore, how does the title, "The
Blighted Empire Strikes Back" hit you?? Huh? Where's the love?
I must admit that the one thing I really missed from my family trips was
decent food. We had one of those Coleman kerosene stoves, and each night
would cook something or other. Not so on my trip through Etosha. I
survived on a fabulous diet: peanut butter and jelly (thanks to all of you
who sent in your comments to my previous PB&J reference, and a special note
of recognition to Mrs. Williford, who had Katie bring a jar all the way from
the U.S.!); biltong/ dry wors (aka jerky); Pringles (drawing on the lessons
of the California All Stars' trips to Europe, as related to me by Sean &
Dale); water; and a fabulous dinner one evening of a can of meatballs in
(cold) gravy. Tasty, and nutritious too! Luckily, the stove was just about
the only important camping thing I didn't have in hand, thanks to my hosting
family in Windhoek. Kelvin, Debbie, Julian, and MichaelWayne Adams (and
their friendly dog Sandy) were incredibly generous to me, and not only did I
stay with them for over a week and a half, but I must express special thanks
for all the outdoors equipment they lent me. My greatest worry was that I'd
forget to return one of these items (probably not the tent), and it would
emerge in my suitcase in South Africa - like the extra tube of toothpaste I
discovered following my brief trip to Botswana (to the Mikayas, I'm sorry!
It looked like my own!).
In terms of the meals: let's be honest, though, they weren't going to be
what would sustain me through that three-day trip. It was the animals.
And, occasionally, the ecology - in particular, when I could look out onto
endless miles of a dry sea (essentially what the Pan is), and seeing a lone
tree emerge as the sole speck on the horizon. But the animalsÖ hyena,
various antelope, ostrich and other weird land-grounded fowl, jackals, and
of course the big ones. My first morning I chanced upon a pride of lions
(well, there were at least four, I'm not sure what the official minimum
number for a pride is, two of whom were checking out a fairly paranoid
lonesome gemsbok who stood erect in the tall grass about 250 meters away. I
was going to see a kill! As I sat in my car for the next hour, frustrated
by the combination of cheap binoculars and lazy lions, it became slowly
apparent that they weren't really interested in answering the call of the
wild after all. And I mused about the irony of my eager anticipation of a
death, despite being the supposed peacemaker sort I aim to be.
The best place to visit there - for all those of you who've been inspired to
plan a trip to Etosha in the near future - is the waterhole located just
next to the Okaukeujo campsite. Practically any time of day that you walk
over to the benches overlooking the waterhole you will see animals partaking
of its life-giving sustenance. The most exciting time, however, is at dark.
This was when I learned the answer to the age-old question, 'When does a
2000-pound rhino look tiny?' When it is standing near a herd of elephants,
of course! Each evening Okaukeujo's floodlit water source is visited by
dozens of elephant: my first night I saw almost 50 of these magnificent
creatures, as well as about 10 black rhino. My final morning I woke up very
early, and went to visit the waterhole for a final look, and a quiet one -
Okaukeujo's only major downfall is the number of tourists who are there
(some evenings you will share the view with over a 100 folks). As I sat
there, with only one or two other people sharing the moment, seven lionesses
emerged from the darkness for a draught. It excited my human companions,
and me but scared the dickens out of the solitary giraffe that had nervously
approached the hole a few minutes beforehand.
Although the big game was clearly the most exciting to watch, I came to
recognize that it is another creature altogether that is the most powerful
in the savannah. My choice for southern Africa's strongest walking animal
is: the ant. This tiny insect manages to build mammoth kingdoms thousands
of times bigger than itself - I often drove past anthills that rose above
adjacent trees, two to three meters high (six to ten feet, for those of you
not yet metrically-oriented). Looking for tall and funky-shaped anthills
became a good distraction during my seven-hour drive from Etosha to
Swakupmond, a German tourist village located on the Atlantic Ocean, which
was my next destination.
The only other thing which kept my mind occupied during that day-long
journey (besides my previously-catalogued music collection) was the hard
question about whether or not I should pick up locals who were often begging
for lifts on the roadside. On my initial highway drive up to the north I
did not do so, reasoning that I didn't speak the local language, I didn't
know how safe it was (in South Africa I had certainly received many warnings
to never pick up hitch-hikers, no matter how nice they seemed), and someone
else would soon come by. It was harder to feel okay zooming by people
sitting on the more isolated western rural roads. I eased myself into the
process by picking up a couple workers going to Etosha from the main
highway, on my way into the national park. And upon my departure from the
main gate, I picked up an older woman resident going to a school 90
kilometers away. These modest but significant actions gave me the courage
to pick up about 8-10 people in total in my last couple days on the road,
depositing them safe and free-of-charge further along their route. The only
negative from this experience was that most spoke little English, so I was
not able to really converse with them (speaking little to no German,
Afrikaans, Oshiwambo, or Herero). A young kid in his early teens who was
going to visit his mom for the weekend opened up enough to share with me a
bit of his sad family story: he had been pulled out of school and put to
work in a crap job by his drunkard father. It bummed me out.
In Swakupmond I stayed in yet another convent (ya gotta love ëem), and
moseyed around the tourist-focused downtown. My real reason for visiting
there was its close proximity to the Namib-Naukluft Desert, and I spent much
of Saturday the 23rd driving in the desert. Three highlights come to mind.
First, arriving at the 'Moon Landscape' in the northern part of that
national preserve, and gazing out on that awe-inspiring view after having
driven for a half-hour through thick fog to get there. Second, driving for
almost four hours straight to get within a couple kilometers of the famous
red sand dunes. [I didn't have enough time to walk the rest of the way, as
I was running late, but I got darn close.] And finally, I somehow managed
to get through almost the entirety of that long, overwhelmingly isolated day
without car trouble.
Almost. Luckily, I picked the right place to have my fairly minor problem
happen. I returned from the desert to the coastline about 4pm, giving me
enough time for an exhilarating (if exhausting) hour-long march on top of
some of the huge sand dunes (not red, unfortunately) that imposingly gaze
over the ocean. I got back into my car on the beach, and turned to get back
onto the coast highway. Stuck. My little Toyota had gone into sand it
couldn't handle, and dusk was falling. Fortunately, a couple of the little
dune buggies (which I'd been silently admonishing only a few minutes earlier
for the environmental damage they cause) drove by, and two kind fellows
spent the next 15 minutes helping me extricate my car from its predicament.
Serves me right, I suppose. I don't recommend that any of you purchase a
vehicle in southern Africa from a rental company, however. With the wear
and tear that I put on that car in just ten days, there is no way those
things can last for long. Of course, given the fact that they charge about
US$50 per day (I'm serious, almost twice what you would pay in California),
I don't feel all that bad. I probably spent almost as much money on travel
expenses in that one short portion of the trip as in several other weeks
combined.
The next morning I visited St. Boniface Church, the local Anglican parish.
The community was the most openly welcoming of all the churches I'd visited
in the country (living up to our U.S. motto of 'The Episcopal Church
Welcomes You'), and I had apparently arrived on a very appropriate Sunday.
Two other visitors from overseas were their special guests for that service,
a pair of women from a church in Manchester, England, who were looking to
set up a companion congregation-to-congregation relationship. Since I was
also asked to offer a few words as an international visitor (per usual), I
was able to speak very positively about this proposed companion church
relationship. After all, I noted, my own trip to southern Africa had been
largely inspired by two such partnerships (Christ Church, Poughkeepsie, with
a church in the South African diocese of Klerksdorp, when I was a youth; and
my recent employer, Grace Cathedral, San Francisco, with St. George's
Cathedral in Cape Town).
I've summarized the meetings I held that following week in the early part of
this message, so, amazingly, I'll try to end here. There was one other very
special couple I met before departing, though, James and Sally Kauluma. He
is the former bishop of the diocese, and I had a wonderful dinner at their
home and tried to catch them up with many of their friends from the
Episcopal Church, USA, who they remember warmly. Thanks again to Brian and
Diane for helping me make that connection; they send their best greetings to
you both and to many others on this email list.
There is one broad (perhaps too broad) request I'd like to make. Some of
the teachers up in Odibo, and many other young people around southern
Africa, asked me about scholarships for study in the United States. If you
have any ideas (broad or specific) that might help me to answer this
frequent question, I would be most grateful.
The other summary piece I wish to say is to encourage any of you that have
an opportunity to visit Namibia. The only reason I went there was because I
had a few friends who told me that if I was in South Africa and had the
chance to go north, I should do so. And I am glad I did. You get a
different look at southern Africa through the Namibian people, the landscape
(including its incredible deserts, the seemingly endless savannah, & the
northern wooded region), and especially the people. Namibians are eager to
meet and welcome more people from North America (and elsewhere), so if you
can visit, do so.
I close as always with a few special shout-outs. First of all, I want to
wish warm greetings to all those in the peacemaking community who took part
in the Fellowship of Reconciliation's 40 Days of Peace vigil in Washington
DC over the past month. I wish I could have joined you this past week for
the Episcopal Peace Fellowship gathering, in particular. Also words of
recognition to all of my church friends that managed to survive the two-week
General Convention in Denver last month. Congratulations on what seemed to
be a fairly reconciling gathering, from the brief highlights I saw glancing
at the Episcopal Church's home page. In that churchy peacenik vein, I'd
also encourage all of you to say special prayers this coming Sunday, August
6th, for the victims of Hiroshima and of all forms of nuclear warfare. As
many of you know, August 6th is not only the anniversary of that horrific
bombing, but in the liturgical calendar it is also the Feast of the
Transfiguration, an appropriate connection.
Birthday greetings this month go to Reeve, my main man Andy (ëBanks, go
Huskies), Stephanie McC-K, Jess, Irina, Mark T, Monroe (the Don), Zoe, Nat
P, Sneep (the Wad), Robb (Mouse), Gwen, Tucker, Bill (Bear), Carrie A, and
Gregg (Lemons). I'm also wishing wonderful anniversaries to my homegirl
Sharon & Clayton, Sarah & Andrew, Durba & Robert, Christine & John, Eric &
Karen, Dan & Melissa, Denise & Marc, Tom & Roma, and Joe & Dana. I want to
send a special, albeit belated, public congratulations to my brother Rowan,
who recently was awarded a Fulbright fellowship to spend a year in China
continuing his graduate studies in archaeology. You da man, bro.
And finally, one more word of thanks to all of you who have 'thunk good
thoughts' of me, sending greetings and saying silent prayers for my journey.
For a variety of reasons, this part of the several-month trip was where I
think I needed them the most: due to the nearby violence at the border; the
days of driving alone in that small car; and my internal struggles. I'm
deeply grateful. Don't stop thinking about me just yet: over the next three
weeks I expect cover nine cities in four separate countries! But hopefully
everything will work out okay, with your support. The final leg of this
journey has begun.
Peace, love, and courage,
Ethan